Data Colada
Menu
  • Home
  • Table of Contents
  • Feedback Policy
  • About
Menu

[9] Titleogy: Some facts about titles


Posted on December 4, 2013August 16, 2021 by Uri Simonsohn

Naming things is fun. Not sure why, but it is. I have collaborated in the naming of people, cats, papers, a blog, its posts, and in coining the term "p-hacking." All were fun to do. So I thought I would write a Colada on titles.

To add color I collected some data. At the end what I wrote was quite boring, so I killed it, but the facts seemed worth sharing. Here they go, in mostly non-contextualized prose.

Cliché titles
I dislike titles with (unmodified) idioms. The figure below shows how frequent some of them are in the web-of-science archive.
f1
Ironically, the most popular (I found), at 970 papers, is “What’s in a name?” …Lack of originality?

Colonization
A colleague once shared his disapproval of the increase in the use of colons in titles. With this post as an excuse, I used Mozenda to scrape ~30,000 psychology paper titles published across 19 journals over 40 years, and computed the fraction including a colon. “Colleague was Wrong: Title Colonization Has Been Stable at about 63% Since the 1970s.” [1]

That factoid took a couple of hours to generate. Data in hand I figured I should answer more questions. Any sense of coherence in this piece disappears with the next pixel.

Have titles gotten longer over time? 
f2
Yes. At about 1.5 characters per year (or a tweet a century).
note: controlling for journal fixed effects.

Three less obvious questions to ask
Question 1. What are the two highest scoring Scrabble words used in a Psychology title?
f3
Hypnotizability (37 points), is used in several articles it turns out. [2] Ventriloquized (36 points) only in this paper.

Question 2. What is the most frequent last-word in a Psychology paper title?
(try guessing before reading the next line)

This is probably the right place to let you know the Colada has a Facebook page now 

Winner: 137 titles end with: “Tasks”
Runner up: 70 titles end with “Effect”

Question 3. What’s more commonly used in a Psychology title, “thinking” or “sex”?
Not close.

Sex: 407.
Thinking: 172.

Alright, that's not totally fair, in psychology sex often refers to gender rather than the activity. Moreover, thinking (172) is, as expected for academic papers, more common than doing (44).
But memory blows sex, thinking, and doing combined out of the water with 2008 instances; one in 15 psychology titles has the word memory in them.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  1. I treated the Journal of Consumer Research as a psychology journal, a decision involving two debatable assumptions. [↩]
  2. Shane Frederick indicated via email that this is a vast underestimate that ignores tripling of points; Hypnotizability could get you 729 points . [↩]

Related

Get Colada email alerts.

Join 10.6K other subscribers

Social media

Recent Posts

  • [125] "Complexity" 2: Don't be mean to the median
  • [124] "Complexity": 75% of participants missed comprehension questions in AER paper critiquing Prospect Theory
  • [123] Dear Political Scientists: The binning estimator violates ceteris paribus
  • [122] Arresting Flexibility: A QJE field experiment on police behavior with about 40 outcome variables
  • [121] Dear Political Scientists: Don't Bin, GAM Instead

Get blogpost email alerts

Join 10.6K other subscribers

tweeter & facebook

We announce posts on Twitter
We announce posts on Bluesky
And link to them on our Facebook page

Posts on similar topics

Just fun
  • [120] Off-Label Smirnov: How Many Subjects Show an Effect in Between-Subjects Experiments?
  • [72] Metacritic Has A (File-Drawer) Problem
  • [56] TWARKing: Test-Weighting After Results are Known
  • [32] Spotify Has Trouble With A Marketing Research Exam
  • [22] You know what's on our shopping list
  • [15] Citing Prospect Theory
  • [9] Titleogy: Some facts about titles
  • [8] Adventures in the Assessment of Animal Speed and Morality
  • [5] The Consistency of Random Numbers

search

© 2021, Uri Simonsohn, Leif Nelson, and Joseph Simmons. For permission to reprint individual blog posts on DataColada please contact us via email..