Data Colada
Menu
  • Home
  • Table of Contents
  • Feedback Policy
  • About
Menu

[128] LinkedOut: The Best Published Audit Study, And Its Interesting Shortcoming

Posted on June 23, 2025June 22, 2025 by Uri Simonsohn

There is a recent QJE paper reporting a LinkedIn audit study comparing responses to requests by Black vs White young males. I loved the paper. At every turn you come across a clever, effortful, and effective solution to a challenge posed by studying discrimination in a field experiment. But, no paper is perfect, and this…

Read more

[127] Meaningless Means #4: Correcting Scientific Misinformation

Posted on June 18, 2025June 17, 2025 by Joe Simmons

Before we got distracted by things like being sued, we had been working on a series called Meaningless Means, which exposed the fact that meta-analytic averaging is (really) bad. When a meta-analysis says something like, “The average effect of mindsets on academic performance is d = .32”, you should not take it at face value….

Read more

[126] Stimulus Plots

Posted on June 2, 2025June 2, 2025 by Uri Simonsohn

When we design experiments, we have to decide how to generate and select the stimuli that we use to test our hypotheses. In a forthcoming JPSP article, “Stimulus Sampling Reimagined” (htm), we propose that for at least 60 years we have been thinking about stimulus selection in experiments in the wrong way [1].  Specifically, with…

Read more

[125] "Complexity" 2: Don't be mean to the median

Posted on April 1, 2025April 2, 2025 by Uri Simonsohn

In Colada[124] I summarized a co-authored critique (with Banki, Walatka and Wu) of a recent AER paper that proposed risk preferences reflect 'complexity' rather than preferences a-la Prospect Theory. Ryan Oprea, the AER author, has written a rejoinder (.pdf). Its first main point (pages 5-12), is that our results with medians are 'knife edge' (p.8),…

Read more

[124] "Complexity": 75% of participants missed comprehension questions in AER paper critiquing Prospect Theory

Posted on March 14, 2025March 31, 2025 by Uri Simonsohn

Kahneman and Tversky’s (1979) “Prospect Theory” article is the most cited paper in the history of economics, and it won Kahneman the Nobel Prize in 2002. Among other things, it predicts that people are risk seeking for unlikely gains (e.g., they pay more than $1 for a 1% chance of $100) but risk averse for…

Read more

[123] Dear Political Scientists: The binning estimator violates ceteris paribus

Posted on March 5, 2025March 5, 2025 by Uri Simonsohn

This post delves into a disagreement I have with three prominent political scientists, Jens Hainmueller, Jonathan Mummolo, and Yiqing Xu (HMX), on a fundamental methodological question: how to analyze interactions in observational data?  In 2019, HMX proposed the "binning estimator" for studying interactions, a technique that is now commonly used by political scientists.  I argued…

Read more

[122] Arresting Flexibility: A QJE field experiment on police behavior with about 40 outcome variables

Posted on January 7, 2025February 5, 2025 by Uri Simonsohn

A forthcoming paper in the Quarterly Journal of Economics (QJE), "A Cognitive View of Policing" (htm), reports results from a field experiment showing that teaching police officers to "consider different ways of interpreting situations they encounter" led to "reductions in use of force, [and] discretionary arrests" (abstract). In this post I explain why, having spent…

Read more

[121] Dear Political Scientists: Don't Bin, GAM Instead

Posted on December 3, 2024March 5, 2025 by Uri Simonsohn

There is a 2019 paper, in the journal Political Analysis (htm), with over 1000 Google cites, titled "How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice".   The paper is not just widely cited, but is also actually influential. Most political science papers estimating interactions now-a-days, seem to…

Read more

[120] Off-Label Smirnov: How Many Subjects Show an Effect in Between-Subjects Experiments?

Posted on September 16, 2024September 16, 2024 by Uri Simonsohn

There is a classic statistical test known as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test (Wikipedia). This post is about an off-label use of the KS-test that I don’t think people know about (not even Kolmogorov or Smirnov), and which seems useful for experimentalists in behavioral science and beyond (most useful, I think, for clinical trials and field…

Read more

[119] A Hidden Confound in a Psych Methods Pre‑registrations Critique

Posted on September 2, 2024September 2, 2024 by Uri Simonsohn

A forthcoming paper in Psych Methods (.pdf) had a set of coders evaluate 300 pre-registrations in terms of how informative they were about several study attributes (e.g., hypotheses, analysis, DVs). The authors analyzed the subjective codings and concluded that many pre-registrations in psychology, especially those relying on the AsPredicted template, provide insufficient information., Central to…

Read more
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 13
  • Next

Get Colada email alerts.

Join 10.7K other subscribers

Social media

Recent Posts

  • [128] LinkedOut: The Best Published Audit Study, And Its Interesting Shortcoming
  • [127] Meaningless Means #4: Correcting Scientific Misinformation
  • [126] Stimulus Plots
  • [125] "Complexity" 2: Don't be mean to the median
  • [124] "Complexity": 75% of participants missed comprehension questions in AER paper critiquing Prospect Theory

Get blogpost email alerts

Join 10.7K other subscribers

tweeter & facebook

We announce posts on Twitter
We announce posts on Bluesky
And link to them on our Facebook page

Posts on similar topics

    search

    © 2021, Uri Simonsohn, Leif Nelson, and Joseph Simmons. For permission to reprint individual blog posts on DataColada please contact us via email..