Data Colada
Menu
  • Home
  • Table of Contents
  • Feedback Policy
  • About
Menu

Category: About Research Design

[124] "Complexity": 75% of participants missed comprehension questions in AER paper critiquing Prospect Theory

Posted on March 14, 2025March 31, 2025 by Uri Simonsohn

Kahneman and Tversky’s (1979) “Prospect Theory” article is the most cited paper in the history of economics, and it won Kahneman the Nobel Prize in 2002. Among other things, it predicts that people are risk seeking for unlikely gains (e.g., they pay more than $1 for a 1% chance of $100) but risk averse for…

Read more

[51] Greg vs. Jamal: Why Didn’t Bertrand and Mullainathan (2004) Replicate?

Posted on September 6, 2016February 15, 2020 by Uri Simonsohn

Bertrand & Mullainathan (2004, .htm) is one of the best known and most cited American Economic Review (AER) papers [1]. It reports a field experiment in which resumes given typically Black names (e.g., Jamal and Lakisha) received fewer callbacks than those given typically White names (e.g., Greg and Emily). This finding is interpreted as evidence of racial discrimination…

Read more

[46] Controlling the Weather

Posted on February 2, 2016January 30, 2020 by Joe & Uri

Behavioral scientists have put forth evidence that the weather affects all sorts of things, including the stock market, restaurant tips, car purchases, product returns, art prices, and college admissions. It is not easy to properly study the effects of weather on human behavior. This is because weather is (obviously) seasonal, as is much of what…

Read more

[36] How to Study Discrimination (or Anything) With Names; If You Must

Posted on April 23, 2015May 23, 2020 by Uri Simonsohn

Consider these paraphrased famous findings: “Because his name resembles ‘dentist,’ Dennis became one” (JPSP, .pdf) “Because the applicant was black (named Jamal instead of Greg) he was not interviewed” (AER, .pdf) “Because the applicant was female (named Jennifer instead of John), she got a lower offer” (PNAS, .pdf) Everything that matters (income, age, location, religion) correlates with…

Read more

[31] Women are taller than men: Misusing Occam’s Razor to lobotomize discussions of alternative explanations

Posted on December 18, 2014February 11, 2020 by Uri Simonsohn

Most scientific studies document a pattern for which the authors provide an explanation. The job of readers and reviewers is to examine whether that pattern is better explained by alternative explanations. When alternative explanations are offered, it is common for authors to acknowledge that although, yes, each study has potential confounds, no single alternative explanation…

Read more

Get Colada email alerts.

Join 10.6K other subscribers

Social media

Recent Posts

  • [125] "Complexity" 2: Don't be mean to the median
  • [124] "Complexity": 75% of participants missed comprehension questions in AER paper critiquing Prospect Theory
  • [123] Dear Political Scientists: The binning estimator violates ceteris paribus
  • [122] Arresting Flexibility: A QJE field experiment on police behavior with about 40 outcome variables
  • [121] Dear Political Scientists: Don't Bin, GAM Instead

Get blogpost email alerts

Join 10.6K other subscribers

tweeter & facebook

We announce posts on Twitter
We announce posts on Bluesky
And link to them on our Facebook page

Posts on similar topics

About Research Design
  • [124] "Complexity": 75% of participants missed comprehension questions in AER paper critiquing Prospect Theory
  • [51] Greg vs. Jamal: Why Didn’t Bertrand and Mullainathan (2004) Replicate?
  • [46] Controlling the Weather
  • [36] How to Study Discrimination (or Anything) With Names; If You Must
  • [31] Women are taller than men: Misusing Occam’s Razor to lobotomize discussions of alternative explanations

search

© 2021, Uri Simonsohn, Leif Nelson, and Joseph Simmons. For permission to reprint individual blog posts on DataColada please contact us via email..