Fridays @
Berkeley Time: 9AM-10AM
Philadelphia Time: 12PM-1PM
Barcelona Time: 6PM-7PM
Zoom link: https://datacolada.org/zoom
Add the seminars to your calendar with a single meeting request file .
Everybody is welcome. to get email reminders of each seminar.
(this mailing list is separate from the list for blog post announcements)
Schedule for Spring 2022
[/bg_collapse]
| Date | Speaker | Title |
| Feb 4, 2022 | Joowon Klusowski (htm) | Does Choice Cause an Illusion of Control? Abstract
|
| Feb 11, 2022 | NO SEMINAR – JDM Conference | |
| Feb 18, 2022 | Dante Donati (htm) | The End of Tourist Traps: A Natural Experiment on the Impact of Tripadvisor on Quality Upgrading Abstract Abstract. |
| Feb 25, 2022 | Ziad Obermeyer (htm) | Diagnosing Physician Error: A Machine Learning Approach to Low-Value Health Care Abstract Abstract. We use machine learning as a tool to study decision making, focusing specifically on how physicians diagnose heart attack. An algorithmic model of a patient's probability of heart attack allows us to identify cases where physician testing decisions deviate from predicted risk. We then use actual health outcomes to evaluate whether those deviations represent mistakes or physicians' superior knowledge. This approach reveals two inefficiencies. Physicians over-test: predictably low-risk patients are tested, but do not benefit. At the same time, physicians under-test: predictably high-risk patients are left untested, and then go on to suffer adverse health events including death. A natural experiment using shift-to-shift testing variation confirms these findings. Simultaneous over- and under-testing cannot easily be explained by incentives alone, and instead point to systematic errors in judgment. We provide suggestive evidence on the psychology underlying these errors. First, physicians use too simple a model of risk. Second, they over-weight factors that are salient or representative of heart attack, such as chest pain. We argue health care models must incorporate physician error, and illustrate how policies focused solely on incentive problems can produce large inefficiencies. |
| Mar 4, 2022 | Betsy Levy Paluck (htm) | Prejudice Reduction: Progress and Challenges Abstract Abstract. The past decade has seen rapid growth in research that evaluates methods for reducing prejudice. This essay reviews 418 experiments reported in 309 manuscripts from 2007 to 2019 to assess which approaches work best and why. Our quantitative assessment uses meta-analysis to estimate average effects. Our qualitative assessment calls attention to landmark studies that are noteworthy for sustained interventions, imaginative measurement, and transparency. However, 76% of all studies evaluate light touch interventions, the long-term impact of which remains unclear.The modal intervention uses mentalizing as a salve for prejudice. Although these studies report optimistic conclusions, we identify troubling indications of publication bias that may exaggerate effects. Furthermore, landmark studies often find limited effects, which suggests the need for further theoretical innovation or synergies with other kinds of psychological or structural interventions. We conclude that much research effort is theoretically and empirically ill-suited to provide actionable, evidence-based recommendations for reducing prejudice. |
| Mar 11, 2022 | Ioannis Evangelidis (htm) | How Much does Diminishing Sensitivity Impact Choice? Abstract Abstract. Classic theories of perception, cognition, and judgment and decision-making assert that people exhibit diminishing sensitivity to magnitude changes. For instance, according to Prospect Theory’s value function, the pleasure of moving from 0 to $1000 is larger than the pleasure of moving from $1000 to $2000, while the pleasure of moving from $1000 to $2000 is larger than the pleasure of moving from $2000 to $3000. In this talk, I will present empirical evidence from a series of experiments that call into question how much diminishing sensitivity actually impacts choice, as well as the nature of the value function. I will discuss a special form of diminishing sensitivity, rapidly diminishing sensitivity, which postulates that people are sensitive to the presence versus absence of outcomes, but are rather insensitive to the scope of the outcomes when the latter differ from zero. Rapidly diminishing sensitivity yields a value function that flattens out rapidly as we move away from zero. In the special case where the value function flattens out immediately after zero, rapidly diminishing sensitivity assumes a discrete form that I coin discrete sensitivity. I will demonstrate that rapidly diminishing sensitivity and discrete sensitivity are typically observed in experimental studies that involve extensive manipulations of the size of the outcomes across decisions, while holding everything else constant. I will provide evidence for my hypothesis in a series of well-powered preregistered experiments across a wide range of domains, such as financial decisions, valuations of human lives, purchase decisions, judgments of goal-related performance, intertemporal choices, and moral decisions. |
| Mar 18, 2022 | Marissa Sharif (htm) | Work-to-Unlock Rewards: Leveraging Goals in Reward Systems to Increase Consumer Persistence Abstract Abstract. Eight studies (N = 5,025) demonstrate that consumers persist more when they must complete a target number of goal-related actions before receiving continuous rewards (i.e., what we term work-to-unlock rewards) than when they receive continuous rewards for their effort right away (i.e., what we term work-to-receive rewards). We suggest that the motivating power of work-to-unlock rewards arises because these rewards (1) naturally encourage consumers to set an attainable goal to start earning rewards, motivating consumers initially through goal setting and (2) keep consumers engaged after reaching this goal due to low perceived progress in earning rewards. We reveal that a work-to-unlock reward structure increases persistence relative to standard continuous rewards across a variety of consumer relevant domains (e.g., exercising, flossing, evaluating products), and even when work-to-unlock rewards offer rewards of a lower magnitude. We further demonstrate that work-to-unlock rewards outperform other reward structures that encourage goal setting. Lastly, we identify a theoretically consistent boundary condition of this effect: the length of the unlocking period. |
| Mar 25, 2022 | Sydney Scott (htm) | In Goal Pursuit, Flexibility is the Best Choice For Me, but Not For You Abstract Abstract. Consumers regularly attempt to improve themselves. Across 8 preregistered studies, we examine how consumers think about flexibility during goal pursuit, for themselves and for others. Flexibility involves leaving details of a plan, such as when to go to the gym or what to eat, open or easy to change. We find that people are more likely to think flexibility is the best choice for themselves than for someone else. We also find a reason why this occurs. Many people perceive flexible plans to be less effective, but also more appealing (that is, less unpleasant), than rigid ones. Choosing for oneself, as opposed to for someone else, increases the degree to which one follows one’s heart (i.e., relies on feelings and desires), which makes people more likely to choose the more appealing option, flexibility. Asking people to “follow their heads” instead (i.e., rely on logic and reason) causes people to choose similar (rigid) plans for themselves and others. Finally, we use this framework to increase preferences for rigid fitness plans in a field experiment. This research provides insight into the psychology of flexibility and how to nudge consumers to set themselves up for success. |
| Apr 1, 2022 | George Loewenstein (htm) | Narratives and Valuations Abstract Abstract. While the significance of narrative thinking has become increasingly recognized by economists, very little empirical research has documented its consequences for economically significant outcomes. We address this gap in one important domain: valuations. In two online experiments, participants either told the story of an item they owned (mug in study 1, hat in 2) or listed its characteristics and were then offered the opportunity to sell it via an incentive-compatible procedure. The narrative treatment led to substantially higher selling prices (33% increase on average) and unwillingness to sell rates (78% increase). The impact of different narrative types is also explored. Paper available on SSRN |
| Apr 8, 2022 | Joachim Vosgerau (htm) | Big Data – Big Biases |
| Apr 15, 2022 | Daniel Feiler (htm) | The Worst-First Heuristic: How Decision-Makers Manage Conjunctive Risk |
| Apr 22, 2022 | Nick Yeung (htm) | Confidence, Trust and Adaptive Decision Making Abstract Abstract. When we make decisions, we have a subjective sense of confidence about whether the choices we're making are good or bad. Confidence is usually predictive of objective accuracy, which enables us to use this subjective evaluation to regulate our decision making process in adaptive ways. In my talk, I'll focus in particular on the role of confidence in evaluating social information in decision making, and how we learn whether or not to trust others' advice. |
| April 29, 2022 | Joint presenters: Woojin Kim (htm) & Elizabeth Linos (htm) | Bottlenecks for Evidence Adoption Abstract Abstract. Governments increasingly use RCTs to test innovations before scale up. Yet, we know little about whether and how they incorporate the results of the experiments. We follow up with 67 US city departments which collectively ran 73 RCTs in collaboration with a national Nudge Unit to improve city communications using nudges. The city departments adopt the nudge treatment in follow-on communication in 27% of the 73 RCTs. As potential determinants of adoption we consider (i) the strength of the evidence, (ii) features of the organization, such as \state capacity" of the city and whether the staff member working on the RCT is still involved, and (iii) features of the treatment, such as whether it was implemented as part of pre-existing communication. We find (i) a limited impact of strength of the evidence and (ii) some impact of city features, especially the retention of the original staff member. By far, the largest predictor of adoption is (iii) whether the communication was pre-existing, as opposed to a new communication. We consider two main interpretations of this finding: organizational inertia, in that changes to pre-existing communications are more naturally folded into the year-to-year city communication, and costs, since new communications may require additional funding. We find the same pattern for electronic communications, with zero marginal costs, supporting the organizational inertia explanation. We compare the findings to the predictions of experts and practitioners. Forecasters over-estimate the extent of evidence-based adoption and, while they anticipate the importance of inertia, they do not foresee the channel through which it would operate. We thus stress the importance of creating a path to adoption as part of the RCT design when the goal is implementation into policy. |
See past schedules with links to videos of the talks, or visit our YouTube channel.
